A url may contain a hash/an anchor reference. If you need to remove it from url, it’s quite easy. Here’s a short recipe on how to do it in PHP (including a little test input):

$urls = array(
	'http://example.com/',
	'http://example.com/#test',
	'http://example.com/?id=1',
	'http://example.com/?id=1#test',
	'http://example.com/?id=1&id2=2#test#test',
	'http://example.com/?id=1#test#test'
);

foreach ($urls as $url) {
	if (strpos($url, '#')) {
		$url = substr($url, 0, strpos($url, '#'));
	}
	echo $url, "\\n";
}

Apart from removing the hash ending from urls, the function can naturally also be used on any number of other similar cases, where you need to trim a string.

PHP 5.4 comes with a built-in webserver, which can be useful for development and quick tests. It easily launched from the command-line, but if you’re running Linux Mint or Ubuntu, the PHP version, isn’t 5.4 but 5.3.x. If you don’t have the time/courage/energy to compile PHP 5.4 yourself, some nice fellow on the internet has done the work and made it available through a package repository which makes it a breeze to install.

So your current website - if running PHP - and it seems to work just fine. I am however working on a project, where the new servers are running on a 64 bit version of the OS. This change seem to cause a number of potential issues, and as there didn’t seem to be a resource collection the issues, I’ll try to post a few notes on the experience. Please feel free to add applicable notes and links in the comments.

Just a word of warning when using PHP and Mysql - if you’re trying to make efficient code and not utilizing all sort of frameworks and abstractions, you might be in for a small surprise in a default setting.

Usually is slightly lazy and often use the mysql_fetch_assoc function. It provides each row as an associative array, and is quite convenient to work with. Recently however while optimizing some code, I figured I’d switch to using mysql_fetch_array assuming it should be more efficient. The logic being that mapping hash keys to array values wouldn’t be needed and it should use less memory.

In most web applications there’s a host of functions (or methods if speaking in the object-oriented world). It’s widely recognized, that it’s probably a good idea to name them something, which may suggest the purpose or functionality of what the function is doing, but often developers seem to fail at making a stringent naming convention. Before starting on your next big development adventure, here are a three suggested rules for naming functions.